Could a nuclear blast be contained?
Underground nuclear testing is the test detonation of nuclear weapons that is performed underground. When the device being tested is buried at sufficient depth, the nuclear explosion may be contained, with no release of radioactive materials to the atmosphere.
A single nuclear weapon can destroy a city and kill most of its people. Several nuclear explosions over modern cities would kill tens of millions of people. Casualties from a major nuclear war between the US and Russia would reach hundreds of millions. What if We Nuke a City?
They're called “broken arrows“: unexpected events involving nuclear weapons that result in “accidental launching, firing, detonating, theft, or loss.” Ever since nuclear weapons came into existence over 75 years ago, there have been at least 32 such events, yet none has resulted in a calamitous atomic explosion.
Hiding in a refrigerator during a nuclear bomb is not a safe or effective way to protect yourself from the aftermath of the explosion.
A declassified document shared by nuclear historian Alex Wellerstein gives the verdict that scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory and test site reached in 1945. They found that "it would require only in the neighborhood of 10 to 100 Supers of this type" to put the human race in peril.
But the vast majority of the human population would suffer extremely unpleasant deaths from burns, radiation and starvation, and human civilization would likely collapse entirely.
Irwin Redlener at Columbia University specialises in disaster preparedness and notes that there are six cities in the US that are more likely to be targeted in a nuclear attack – New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington DC.
200 such bombs dropped over a range of cities would kill something like 100,000,000 people (out of about 300,000,000) and destroy almost all our infrastructure for energy (oil refineries, power grids,...)
To increase the probability of an intercept, the United States has to shoot multiple interceptors at each incoming ballistic missile. At present, because its inventory of interceptors is limited, the United States can shoot down only a handful of ballistic missiles that have relatively unsophisticated countermeasures.
The U.S. narrowly avoided a catastrophic disaster when two Mark 39 hydrogen bombs were accidentally dropped over Goldsboro, North Carolina, on January 23, 1961.
How long after a nuke is it safe to come out?
Radiation levels are extremely dangerous immediately after a nuclear detonation, but the levels reduce rapidly, in just hours to a few days. This is when it will be safest to leave your shelter and participate in an orderly evacuation.
FARO, Wayne County — United States military leaders have admitted to losing six nuclear weapons since 1950. Unsealed documents show one is in the Mediterranean Sea, two are in the Pacific Ocean, two in the Atlantic Ocean and one is in Eastern North Carolina.

The study involved looking at abrupt sunlight-reducing situations. Scientists have recently revealed that Australia and New Zealand are best placed to survive a nuclear apocalypse and help reboot collapsed human civilisation. The study, published in the journal Risk Analysis.
Australia and New Zealand best placed to survive nuclear apocalypse, study finds. The lucky country can count on one more piece of good fortune, with researchers finding Australia – followed by neighbour New Zealand – best placed to survive a nuclear winter and help reboot a collapsed human civilisation.
For the survivors of a nuclear war, this lingering radiation hazard could represent a grave threat for as long as 1 to 5 years after the attack. Predictions of the amount and levels of the radioactive fallout are difficult because of several factors.
New York City and the surrounding area would be blasted to pieces by no less than 12 Russian thermonuclear weapons, with bombs targeting federal reserve bank buildings, energy-producing utilities, communications hubs, and airports. In this scenario, Manhattan would be completely destroyed.
The bomb would shower the local magma, rock and dirt with radioactive particles while a tremendous amount of pressure is being created in the chamber very quickly. There's only one place for this magma, rock and pressure to go: Out. Some of the erupting material will be lava, but that isn't the dangerous bit.
Recovery would probably take about 3-10 years, but the Academy's study notes that long term global changes cannot be completely ruled out. The reduced ozone concentrations would have a number of consequences outside the areas in which the detonations occurred.
Once you survive the initial blast, you're going to want as much dense material — concrete, bricks, lead, or even books — between you and the radiation as possible. Fallout shelters are your next safest bet, as they will provide the highest protection from this debris.
IT'S NOT just cockroaches. Lots of invertebrates will do rather well. Scorpions, for example, are so effective at relecting radiation that they glow when you shine an ultra-violet light on them. They would laugh off a nuclear winter, too.
What happens if a nuclear war starts?
A nuclear attack could cause substantial fatalities, injuries, and infrastructure damage from the heat and blast of the explosion, and significant radiological consequences from both the initial nuclear radiation and the radioactive fallout that settles after the initial event.
Some estimates name Maine, Oregon, Northern California, and Western Texas as some of the safest locales in the case of nuclear war, due to their lack of large urban centers and nuclear power plants.
Irwin Redlener at Columbia University specialises in disaster preparedness and notes that there are six cities in the US that are more likely to be targeted in a nuclear attack – New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington DC.
Hyping up a then-new hypersonic nuclear-capable missile, Russian state TV said the Pentagon, Camp David, Jim Creek Naval Radio Station in Washington, Fort Ritchie in Maryland, and McClellan Air Force Base in California, would be targets, according to Reuters.
This new concern has led experts to make predictions as to the likelihood of a nuclear war, with the estimates ranging from 10-20 percent, 16.8 percent or even 20-25 percent, according to The Brookings Institution, a non-profit public policy organization based in Washington, D.C.
The volume the weapon's energy spreads into varies as the cube of the distance, but the destroyed area varies at the square of the distance. Thus 1 bomb with a yield of 1 megaton would destroy 80 square miles. While 8 bombs, each with a yield of 125 kilotons, would destroy 160 square miles.
Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles take about half an hour to fly from launch to target.
The U.S. Air Force has a top-secret space weapon and is preparing to show it to the world. For months, the service has been preparing to declassify the "black" weapon, but wants to get the timing right, according to a Breaking Defense exclusive.
If a nuclear weapon hit Washington, DC, it could kill about 300,000 people. If a 300-kiloton nuclear weapon were to strike a city the size of Washington, DC, many residents wouldn't survive, and some nearby residents would face devastating injuries.
Pentagon Estimates China Has Doubled Number of Missiles That Can Hit U.S. A new U.S. military report has assessed that its Chinese counterpart has doubled the number of far-reaching missiles capable of hitting the United States over the course of the past year.
How many times would the US nuke the world?
31): The U.S. has enough nuclear warheads to destroy the world more than 10 times over.
Nuclear weapons. U.S. nuclear warhead stockpiles, 1945–2002. Nuclear weapons have been used twice in combat: two nuclear weapons were used by the United States against Japan during World War II in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The U.S. carried out its last weapons test on September 23, 1992, with the detonation in Nevada of an approximately 20-kiloton device codenamed Divider. (A kiloton is equivalent to a thousand tons of TNT; the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima was about 15 kilotons.)
From the exposure rate determined by a survey instrument, future exposure rates may be predicted from a basic rule known as the "7:10 Rule of Thumb." The 7:10 Rule of Thumb states that for every 7-fold increase in time after detonation, there is a 10-fold decrease in the exposure rate.
Immediately after you are inside shelter, if you may have been outside after the fallout arrived: Remove your outer layer of contaminated clothing to remove fallout and radiation from your body. Take a shower or wash with soap and water to remove fallout from any skin or hair that was not covered.
Alpha particles can be stopped completely by a sheet of paper. Beta particles travel appreciable distances in air, but can be reduced or stopped by a layer of clothing, thin sheet of plastic or a thin sheet of aluminum foil.
As of 2022, about 12,700 nuclear warheads are still estimated to be in use, of which more than 9,400 are in military stockpiles for use by missiles, aircraft, ships and submarines.
For those keeping count, at least two nuclear capsules, four unarmed weapons, and one armed nuclear weapon are currently sitting at the bottom of the sea.
The radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki today is on a par with the extremely low levels of background radiation (natural radioactivity) present anywhere on Earth. It has no effect on human bodies.
Halting an atomic weapon is theoretically possible, say experts, but in reality is an enormous challenge.
Which country would survive a nuclear blast?
Australia and New Zealand best placed to survive nuclear apocalypse, study finds. The lucky country can count on one more piece of good fortune, with researchers finding Australia – followed by neighbour New Zealand – best placed to survive a nuclear winter and help reboot a collapsed human civilisation.
Scientists have recently revealed that Australia and New Zealand are best placed to survive a nuclear apocalypse and help reboot collapsed human civilisation. The study, published in the journal Risk Analysis. These countries include not just Australia and New Zealand, but also Iceland, the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu.
Recovery would probably take about 3-10 years, but the Academy's study notes that long term global changes cannot be completely ruled out. The reduced ozone concentrations would have a number of consequences outside the areas in which the detonations occurred.
The Ground-based Midcourse (GMD) is the only system that is currently in operation to defend the continental United States, and it has 44 interceptors based in Alaska and California.
Some estimates name Maine, Oregon, Northern California, and Western Texas as some of the safest locales in the case of nuclear war, due to their lack of large urban centers and nuclear.
"A good place to be would be in an area which is in a rain shadow, the Rocky Mountains cause the rain clouds to release their water as rain. If you go further east from the Rockies then you will end up in a rain shadow," Foreman said.
The global economic impact of violence was $16.5 trillion in 2021, equivalent to 10.9% of global GDP, or $2,117 per person. Iceland remains the most peaceful country in 2022, a position it has held since 2008. It is joined at the top of the index by New Zealand, Ireland, Denmark and Austria.
Ultimately, the best option is to hide in the corner of a room, away from any openings such as a window or door, where air speed is higher. The authors stress that the time between the explosion and the arrival of the blast wave is only a few seconds, so quickly getting to a safe place is critical.
A potential World War 3 would undoubtedly unleash an unparalleled level of suffering and devastation on a global scale. From the displacement of millions to severe food security threats, humanity would face unprecedented challenges that would strain our capacity to respond.
The cooling would last for years, and, according to the research, could be "catastrophic", disrupting agricultural production and food gathering in particular in higher latitude countries.
How long would fallout last after nuclear war?
For the survivors of a nuclear war, this lingering radiation hazard could represent a grave threat for as long as 1 to 5 years after the attack. Predictions of the amount and levels of the radioactive fallout are difficult because of several factors.
References
- https://www.theweek.co.uk/news/defence/957033/can-anything-stop-a-nuclear-bomb
- https://www.redcross.org/get-help/how-to-prepare-for-emergencies/types-of-emergencies/nuclear-explosion-radiation-emergencies.html
- https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-many-nuclear-weapons-exist-and-who-has-them/
- https://www.icanw.org/take_action_now
- https://www.atomicarchive.com/science/effects/radioactive-fallout.html
- https://www.nature.com/articles/102216b0
- https://www.findingdulcinea.com/what-would-happen-if-world-war-3-started/
- https://www.npr.org/2022/04/01/1090178116/rocket-launchers-bazooka-grenade-california-middle-school
- https://www.icanw.org/catastrophic_harm
- https://www.icanw.org/icc_and_nuclear_weapons
- https://www.britannica.com/one-good-fact/why-was-sliced-bread-banned-in-the-us
- https://article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Ten-criticisms.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki
- https://van.physics.illinois.edu/ask/listing/19504
- https://homework.study.com/explanation/does-the-us-have-a-tsar-bomba.html
- https://www.atf.gov/explosives/illegal-explosives
- https://readingpartners.org/blog/five-more-childrens-books-you-didnt-know-were-banned/
- https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/tannerite-legal-states
- https://outrider.org/nuclear-weapons/articles/smugglers-thieves-and-terrorists
- https://study.com/academy/lesson/why-was-animal-farmed-banned.html
- https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/could-oppenheimer-atomic-bomb-really-have-destroyed-the-world
- https://www.southernfriedscience.com/how-many-nuclear-weapons-are-at-the-bottom-of-the-sea-an-almost-certainly-incomplete-census-of-broken-arrows-over-water/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
- https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/location/nevada-test-site/
- https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/multimedia/infographics/nuclear_weapon.html
- https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Public-Health-Preparedness/Main-Page/Nuclear-and-Radiological-Emergencies
- https://ashtales.com/guides/how-to-survive-a-nuclear-attack
- https://time.com/6290977/nuclear-war-impact-essay/
- https://www.co.monmouth.nj.us/documents/118/IMMEDIATE_ACTION_SHELTER_THEN_EVACUATE.pdf
- https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-nukes-nuclear-weapons-arsenal-11644614407
- https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/what-would-happen-if-all-the-nuclear-bombs-were-detonated
- https://www.newsweek.com/pentagon-estimates-china-has-doubled-number-missiles-that-can-hit-us-1763254
- https://www.ready.gov/radiation
- https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/09/australia-and-new-zealand-best-placed-to-survive-nuclear-apocalypse-study-finds
- https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/us-nuclear-testings-devastating-legacy-lingers-30-years-later
- https://www.un.org/en/observances/end-nuclear-tests-day/history
- https://cdp.dhs.gov/shared/se/courses/default/AWR-923-W%2005122021%201.2-20210512144644/groups/394.html
- https://www.businessinsider.com/likely-us-nuclear-targets-2017-5
- https://assets.nationbuilder.com/ican/pages/3159/attachments/original/1675676348/Implications_for_Africa_of_use_of_nuclear_weapons.pdf?1675676348
- https://www.egattorneys.com/weapon-mass-destruction-penal-code-11418
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219184/
- https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/russia-united-states-nuke-1995/
- https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/documents/effects/wenw/chapter-2.html
- https://www.iflscience.com/what-would-happen-if-you-dropped-bomb-volcano-30400
- https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2023/02/13/no-sunny-days-for-a-decade-extreme-cold-and-starvation-nuclear-winter-and-the-urgent-need-for-public-education/
- https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/emergencies/nuclearfaq.htm
- https://www.reeditionmagazine.com/to-the-minute/is-hiding-in-a-refrigerator-during-a-nuclear-bomb-a-good-idea
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch_on_warning
- https://www.literatibookstore.com/banned-books-2022
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B61_nuclear_bomb
- https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/Documents/Pubs//320-056_ion_fs.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_warfare
- https://bigthink.com/the-past/nuclear-weapon-accidental-detonation/
- https://www.icanw.org/why_a_ban
- https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/documents/effects/wenw/introduction.html
- https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/future-comprehensive-nuclear-test-ban-treaty
- https://k1project.columbia.edu/news/hiroshima-and-nagasaki
- https://www.pepfar.gov/transparency-in-the-u-s-nuclear-weapons-stockpile/
- https://www.businessinsider.com/nuclear-bomb-attack-russia-ukraine-how-strong-far-2022-2
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomb
- https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/classics
- https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a37375726/air-force-secret-space-weapon/
- https://allianceforscience.org/blog/2022/03/what-the-science-says-could-humans-survive-a-nuclear-war-between-nato-and-russia/
- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11643911/How-survive-nuclear-explosion-Scientists-reveal-safest-places-shelter.html
- https://www.wsj.com/articles/north-korea-nuclear-weapons-missiles-explained-11610712018
- https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-2251,00.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba
- https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/bomb
- https://greekreporter.com/2022/10/11/countries-nuclear-weapons-power/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underground_nuclear_weapons_testing
- https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tsar-Bomba
- https://www.livemint.com/news/world/what-are-cluster-bombs-us-sending-to-ukraine-and-why-over-100-countries-have-banned-it-explained-11688954387988.html
- https://steelseries.com/blog/how-to-get-the-nuke-in-warzone-20-886
- https://www.ndtv.com/feature/australia-new-zealand-among-best-placed-to-survive-nuclear-apocalypse-study-finds-3771867
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Prohibition_of_Nuclear_Weapons
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B53_nuclear_bomb
- https://www.historyextra.com/period/second-world-war/atomic-bomb-hiroshima-nagasaki-justified-us-debate-bombs-death-toll-japan-how-many-died-nuclear/
- https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/devastating-effects-of-nuclear-weapons-war/
- https://www.heritage.org/military-strength/assessment-us-military-power/missile-defense
- https://www.businessinsider.com/how-many-super-nukes-destroy-world-2016-12
- https://www.visionofhumanity.org/maps/
- https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat
- https://visitukraine.today/blog/948/a-nuclear-explosion-how-to-prepare-to-survive-and-how-to-act-after
- https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/nuclear-warheads-by-country-1945-2022/
- https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/prep_ied_fact_sheet.pdf
- https://www.newsweek.com/how-can-calculate-nuclear-war-probability-1756967
- https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a34652495/tsar-bomba-challenger-deep-video/
- https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/explainer--what-would-a-nuclear-war-look-like-/47409712
- https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywashburn/2023/02/24/russia-has-the-most-nuclear-weapons-in-the-world-here-are-the-other-countries-with-the-largest-nuclear-arsenals/
- https://levelupgroup.ca/blog/can-i-survive-nuclear-war-in-my-basement/
- https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-george-orwells-novel-1984-tops-russian-bestseller-lists-543214
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamite
- https://history.state.gov/milestones/1961-1968/limited-ban
- https://www.ucpress.edu/blog/52211/more-banned-books-week-at-uc-press/
- https://web.asdeporte.com/quwot1q/safest-place-in-us-during-nuclear-war
- https://www.wyff4.com/article/south-carolina-newberry-tannerite/44029938
- https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/prep_nuclear_fact_sheet.pdf
- https://www.discovery.com/science/Azidoazide-Azide-Most-Explosive-Chemical
- https://www.atomicarchive.com/history/atomic-bombing/index.html
- https://www.quora.com/Does-the-2nd-amendment-allow-people-to-own-nuclear-weapons
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon
- https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a40591175/nyc-nuclear-attack-psa/
- https://www.ready.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/ready_nuclear-explosion_fact-sheet_0.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Response_Scenario_Number_One
- https://www.city.hiroshima.lg.jp/site/english/9809.html
- https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/us-news/2022/03/02/621f6327e2704ec8a08b45c1.html
- https://study.com/learn/lesson/banning-the-great-gatsby-by-f-scott-fitzgerald.html
- https://wcti12.com/news/local/atomic-bomb-missing-in-enc-for-62-years
- https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/27220/legal-right-to-own-nukes
- https://www.wired.com/story/you-might-survive-a-nuclear-blast-if-you-have-the-right-shelter/
- https://blog.batchgeo.com/nuclear-locations-worldwide/
- https://tannerite.com/binary-target-faq/
- https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/01/Hair-Trigger%2520FAQ.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter
- https://www.businessinsider.com/survive-nuclear-explosion-go-inside-shelter-no-windows-2018-1
- https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/nucleartesttally
- https://www.newsweek.com/nuclear-war-bombs-us-safest-place-protection-1750293
- https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-government-map-shows-areas-185026317.html
- https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-map-nuclear-war-russia-b2279249.html
- https://futurism.com/faced-with-a-nuclear-blast-heres-what-you-need-to-do-to-survive
- https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/nuclear-test-ban-treaty
- https://www.enjuris.com/blog/resources/tannerite-explosions/
- https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1437-federal-explosives-statutes-18-usc-841-848
- https://www.icrc.org/en/document/why-nuclear-ban-treaty-matters
- https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-law-in-the-US-prohibiting-private-citizens-from-owning-nuclear-weapons
- https://www.thedailymeal.com/1129524/the-us-once-actually-banned-sliced-bread/
- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11882501/Where-buy-house-build-deluxe-bunker-survive-nuclear-war.html
- https://www.icanw.org/new_study_on_us_russia_nuclear_war
- https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2021/01/22/brush-with-catastrophe-the-day-the-u-s-almost-nuked-itself/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_451
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19575193/
- https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/03/12/nation/after-four-decades-200-billion-us-missile-defense-system-is-no-match-russian-nuclear-attack/
- https://uselessinformation.org/1943-sliced-bread-banned/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sliced_bread
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_disarmament
- https://www.nyc.gov/site/doh/health/emergency-preparedness/emergencies-radiological-nuclear-incident.page
- https://www.atomicarchive.com/almanac/broken-arrows/index.html
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tannerite
- https://www.indy100.com/viral/detonate-every-nuclear-bomb-earth-2659451967
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_Tybee_Island_mid-air_collision
- https://www.atomicarchive.com/science/effects/energy.html
- https://www.atomicarchive.com/science/effects/basic-effects.html
- https://www.wired.com/story/nuclear-tests-have-changed-but-they-never-really-stopped/
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2122